The cost benefit of reduced property flooding for a proposed
project was estimated as the reduction of the cost of damages to
structures and contents plus the cost of displacement/disruption losses.
For residential land use only the financial impact of property damage
and resident displacement due to flooding was considered. For commercial
and institutional land uses the costs associated with disruption of
business due to flooding was also considered. Estimating costs
associated with the above factors is intensive, and a detailed analysis
was considered beyond the scope of this project. Based on the foregoing,
simplifying assumptions were made in order to meet the purposes of this
evaluation. The damage and displacement/disruption costs were assumed
to be related to readily available property value data referenced from
the Alachua County Property Appraiser. In other words, the damage cost
impact for a given flooding instance is related to the value of the
property impacted. Additionally, flooding duration was assumed to not
have a significant impact on flooding costs. In other words, once flood
damages occur the remedial cost would be similar regardless of the
duration. Based on these assumptions, property flooding cost benefit
impacts were estimated using the following equation:
Property Flooding Cost Benefit Impact = Property Value * (Reduced Structure Damage % + Reduced Displacement Cost %)
The actual damage a property incurs is highly variable based on
the depth of flooding and contents. The duration of an impact or
displacement is also highly variable depending on the amount of time
residents require alternate housing or commercial property are unable to
do business. Simplifying assumptions had to be made in order to provide
an empirical relationship that could be applied for this project’s
purposes.
Each flood prone property in a problem area was evaluated to
determine the greatest modeled storm event at which the proposed
conditions model does not show property flooding. This was compared to
the existing conditions model results to identify the increase in the
number of modeled LOS storm events that do not show flooding for each
structure due to the proposed project. Therefore, the reduced damage or
displacement cost % was assigned based on the increase in the number of
LOS storm events that do not show property flooding. The assumed reduced
damage % and reduced displacement % are shown on the following table:
Assumed Cost Reduction Relationships for Residential Property Impacts
LOS Storm Event Increase |
Reduced Damage Cost % |
Reduced Displacement Cost % |
Total % |
5 |
50% |
30% |
80% |
4 |
45% |
25% |
70% |
3 |
40% |
20% |
60% |
2 |
35% |
15% |
50% |
1 |
30% |
10% |
40% |
For commercial and institutional properties an additional 70% was added to the Total % to account for disruption of business.
Note that cost benefit was not considered for properties unless
at least the minimum LOS storm event (i.e., 25 year/24 hour storm
event) did not show flooding for that event under proposed conditions.
Also, note that the frequency of flooding (i.e., how many times per
year, etc.) was not considered in this analysis due to the additional
complexity of estimating frequency of flooding for each property during
each LOS storm event.
Note also that an initial analysis of each project area was
done considering only impacts to structures. Impacted parcels were only
considered in the cost benefit if structure flooding was indicated by
the model results. In this case, damage costs were based on the
structure (building) market value from the Property Appraiser’s
database. If the resulting cost benefit ratio was more than 1, then the
analysis was concluded and left as conservative even though other lot
impacts (yard flooding, etc.) may exist that were not incorporated into
the calculations. For projects where this analysis resulted in a ratio
of less than 1, additional analysis was done incorporating property lot
flooding impacts. In these cases, the benefit impact was based on just
the property value and not including the parcel’s building value. In
these cases where structure flooding was indicated, both impacts were
taken into account and the total fair market property value (lot +
building) was used for benefit calculations. This differentiation is
reflected on the benefit cost table associated with each individual
project.